Accueil
| Titre : | Consensus in Theology ? : A Dialogue with Hans Küng and Edward Schillebeeckx |
| Auteurs : | Swidler, Leonard, Éditeur scientifique |
| Type de document : | texte imprimé |
| Editeur : | Philadelphia [USA] : The Westminster Press, 1980 |
| ISBN/ISSN/EAN : | 978-0-664-21379-4 |
| Format : | viii + 165 p. |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Index. décimale : | HS/G (Histoire de la théologie : XXe siècle) |
| Résumé : |
Certain to be discussed and debated for years to come:
The latest provocative statements from controversial theologians Hans Küng and Edward Schillebeeckx! In December 1979, Hans Küng was censured and told he was no longer a Catholic theologian. Edward Schillebeeckx was investigated and questioned on his Christology by the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Vatican actions against these two respected Catholic theologians and others have left theologians around the world questioning the future of academic freedom, human rights, and ecumenical dialogue. Here in response — published for the first time — are Küng’s and Schillebeeckx’s most recent statements on the very topics on which they have been questioned. Included are: - Hans Küng’s challenging proposal that Catholic, and even ecumenical, concensus might be achieved through concentration on two “poles” of theological discusssion: (1) God's revelation in the history of Israel and of Jesus and (2) our own human world of experience - Edward Schillebeeckx’s clarification of his Christology: “I Believe in Jesus of Nazareth: The Christ, the Son of God, the Lord” - Widely differing responses to Küng and Schillebeeckx from over a dozen leading theologians — not only Catholic and Protestant but also Orthodox, Jewish, Muslim, and Hindu - Hans Küng’s reply to the Vatican following his censure: “Why I Remain a Catholic” - Plus an analysis of the recent controversy and its implications by Leonard Swidler, Editor of the Journal of Ecumenical Studies and a leader among Catholic theologians protesting the Vatican’s actions CONSENSUS IN THEOLOGY? — necessary, informative reading that explains the positions of those involved in the current theological debate. A penetrating work no one seeking to understand the issues can afford to ignore. |
| Note de contenu : |
- Contributors - Introduction * Dialogue: The Way toward Consensus — Leonard Swidler - Essays in Affirmation * Toward a New Consensus in Catholic (and Ecumenical) Theology — Hans Küng * I Believe in Jesus of Nazareth: The Christ, the Son of God, the Lord — Edward Schillebeeckx - Essays in Response Roman Catholic * Particular Questions within General Consensus — David Tracy * Ecumenism and Theological Method — Avery Dulles * Jesus of Nazareth: Today’s Way to God — Gerard Sloyan * History, Sociology and Dialogue: Elements in Contemporary Theological Method — Leonard Swidler * Is a New Christian Consensus Possible? — Rosemary Radford Ruether * The Experiential “Word of God" — Bernard Cooke Protestant — Episcopal — Orthodox * Methodological Consensus? A Protestant Perspective — Arthur B. Crabtree * The Bible as Realistic Narrative — George Lindbeck * Catholic-Ecumenical Theological Consensus? A Reformed Perspective — David Willis * Historical Thinking and Dogmatics — Paul M. van Buren * An Orthodox Contribution to Consensus — Nikos A. Nissiotis Jewish — Muslim — Hindu * Six Jewish Thoughts — Jacob B. Agus * A Muslim Reflection on Religion and Theology — Seyyed Hossein Nasr * A Hindu Self-Reflection —Kana Mitra - Schillebeeckx’s and Küng’s Recent Works * Christology without Jesus of Nazareth Is Ideology: A Monumental Work by Schillebeeckx on Jesus — John Nijenhuis * On Being a Christian —Reviewed by Werner H. Kelber * Does God Exist? — Reviewed by Leonard Swidler * Existiert Gott? — Reviewed by Karl-Josef Kuschel - Final Statement: Why I Remain a Catholic — Hans Küng |
Exemplaires (1)
| Code-barres | Cote | Support | Localisation | Section | Disponibilité |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HS/G 015 | HS/G 015 | Livre | Bibliothèque principale | Livres empruntables | Prêt possible Disponible |
